A Washington state judge blocks the presentation of “artificial intelligence-enhanced” video evidence in a triple murder trial.This is a good thing because too many people seem to think that apps Artificial Intelligence Filter gives them access to secret visual data.
According to a new report, King County, Washington, Judge Leroy McCullough wrote in a new ruling that artificial intelligence technology uses “opaque methods to express what the artificial intelligence model ‘thinks’ should be shown Content”. nbc news Tuesday. In a world of AI hype, what’s happening with these AI tools is refreshing.
“This court believes that the admission of this enhanced evidence will lead to confusion in the matter and the eyewitness testimony and may lead to suspicion of the artificial intelligence model,” McCullough wrote.
The case involves 46-year-old Joshua Puloka, who is accused of killing three people and wounding two others at a bar outside Seattle. 2021. Ploka’s lawyers want to introduce AI-enhanced cellphone video shot by a bystander, although it’s unclear what they think they can glean from the altered footage.
Ploka’s attorneys reportedly hired a creative video production “expert” who had never been involved in a criminal case before to “enhance” the video.The artificial intelligence tool used by the unnamed expert was developed in Texas Topaz Labavailable to anyone with an internet connection.
The introduction of artificial intelligence imaging tools in recent years has led to widespread misunderstanding of the technology’s possibilities. Many believe that running a photo or video through an AI upscaler can give you a better understanding of the visual information you already have.But in reality, the AI software doesn’t provide clearer information about what’s present in the image—the software just Add to Information that does not exist initially.
For example, there’s a widely circulated conspiracy theory that Chris Rock was wearing some kind of mask when he was slapped by Will Smith at the 2022 Academy Awards.This theory arose because people started running screenshots of this slap through image upscalers, thinking they could get a better idea What happened.
But that’s not the case when you run images enhanced with artificial intelligence. Computer programs simply add more information to make the image clearer, which often distorts what’s really going on. Using the slider below, you can see the pixelated image that went viral before people started spreading it through artificial intelligence programs and “discovering” things that weren’t even there in the original broadcast.
Numerous high-resolution photos and videos from the incident clearly show that Rock was not wearing a pad on his face. But that hasn’t stopped people from believing that by “upscaling” images to “8K” they can see what’s hiding in plain sight.
The rise of products labeled with artificial intelligence has created a lot of confusion among ordinary people about what these tools really do.Large language models such as Chat GPT Convincing otherwise intelligent people that these chatbots are capable of complex reasoning is simply not what is happening behind the scenes. The LLM essentially just predicts the next word it should spit out, making it sound like a believable human. But because they sound so human-like, many users think they’re doing something more complex than magic.
This seems to be the reality we are going to live with Billions of dollars are being poured into artificial intelligence companies. Many who should know better believe there is something profound going on behind the scenes and are quick to accuse “bias” and guardrails of being too strict.But when you dig deeper, you’ll find these so called hallucination It’s not some mysterious power generated by people who are too sober, or whatever. They’re just a product of AI technology that’s not very good at its job.
Thankfully, a judge in Washington recognized that the technology couldn’t provide a better image. While we have no doubt that there are many judges across the United States who have bought into the AI hype but don’t understand its implications. It’s only a matter of time before we have AI-enhanced videos in courtrooms that show nothing but visual information added after the fact.